Prosperity and Quality of Life
REconomy means RE-generative E-conomy.
Economic development has always been considered an adversary of the
environment. The economy shapes
and defines the environment. Development
creates a cluttered built environment, congested streets, sprawl, hundreds of
acres of parking lots, rising taxes and increasing crime. The landscape
becomes what architect Frank Lloyd Wright called “American Ugly.”
REconomy requires a new economic
system. It radically changes the way we
use energy and materials. Saying that,
it is an entrepreneurial model that pays for itself. It is a free-market concept.
Regenerative Economy by John Fullerton |
Government agencies create stacks of
documents and regulations to restrain the impact of development on health and
safety but at base governments want development and the revenue potential it
represents. The term “Balance” is a mantra of development but on close
examination, there is no balance between growth and a finite environment:
We cannot create more land, water, farmland, forest and natural beauty.
Quality of life, however, is defined
by economic prosperity. Without businesses, jobs and infrastructure, life
can become grim. Arguably the thing that is worse than growth is economic
decline and impoverishment such as has happened to hundreds of American
communities.
REconomy is a business model that
seeks to strengthen the weak link between the economy and environment. It
seeks not balance but a mission of regenerating, of restoring and improving the
natural features of the community that in large part define quality of life.
Regenerative economics is also about
long-term declining, rustbelt, communities; communities that have struggled,
some for decades, to find an economic model that will restore prosperity,
recreate attractive communities and attract families to find homes in a good
place to live.
In both cases, sustainability is
about creating or restoring a prosperous and secure future drawing on both
emerging technologies and traditional crafts and trades.
Organizing Principles
Communities across the country have
been working for decades to develop plans to promote sustainability.
Really good plans are regrettably few in number. Most communities have
partial plans (that depend on limited public resources). Few have made more than token progress.
The Centre Sustainability Master Plan seeks to fill the need for a
comprehensive sustainability planning template.
Sustainability is first about preserving
or restoring the quality of life of a community. Prosperity and economic
security are achieved through development of the economic potential of the
community but unmanaged growth can have a distressing impact on the quality of
life. The quest for “balance” misses the point. We need rather an
economy that not only creates wealth but also advances the well-being of the
community and secures the style of life we desire to leave as a legacy to
coming generations.
Sustainability is, second, about
achieving freedom from dependence upon, from the risk we are becoming increasingly
aware about, of an uncertain global economy and from reliance on material
resources in places with far from secure political futures.
Sustainability is more than a social
good; it is an economic process. It has to be approached in a
businesslike manner. It involves risk; not just the personal time and
financial investments of entrepreneurs, but of greater importance, of setting
objectives the achievement of which people stake their credibility upon.
It takes a Plan
To achieve any degree of certainty we
must have a plan, a document that defines a vision of the future, a statement
of purpose, a list of common objectives, and the mechanism for achieving them.
A useful plan must be comprehensive
in scope. A community is a complex, dynamic and highly interdependent
network which achieves its greatest identify and efficiency to the degree that
its everyday behavior is well understood. A community is a group of
people who share not only a place but a common sense of identity, values and a
sense of cooperative endeavor to promote the welfare of all of its
members. Transition Centre has pursued Community Ecosystem Mapping as a
tool for achieving this synergy.
We need to understand the planning
process itself. Sustainable economic planning research tells us a great
deal about the potential and the limitations of these plans. Transition
Centre has sought to extract key principles from this research to guide the
formation of an action-oriented process to both assures prosperity and quality
of life. These principles give this model a distinctive if not unique
character.
Our focus is explicitly local.
It is about the place we call home. It is about problems that are within
our grasp to solve. It is about the things we can do for ourselves rather
than depending on outside agencies.
Myths and Other Liabilities
The classical definition of
sustainability is about how we reduce our own consumption to insure there is
enough for future generations. This ideal is arguably no longer
achievable. We have to have a new approach, a new vision, and an
effective program for securing a desirable future.
The weak link in the sustainability
matrix has always been that between the economy and the environment. The
global economy has barely tapped the brakes on economic growth; indeed, what
little restraint we see comes as a result of economic recession rather than
mission. We must, therefore adapt and innovate and we can do this if we
have sufficient motivation.
Of equal importance is the capacity
of the sustainability community, a thin green wedge, lacking in coherence and
organization, lacking in measureable objectives, to achieve the necessary rate
of transformational change to avoid tragic consequences in the future. We address these issues.
A brand new for-profit corporate
legal entity, the Benefit Corporation, provides a mechanism for dramatically
strengthening the reciprocal relationship between ecology and economy, terms
that share the same root.
The Master Plan Template
The Centre Sustainability Master Plan
provides a framework for setting quantifiable goals. From the vision, we
can backcast, step by step, into the sequence of events needed to achieve them.
The plan begins with a detailed
community assessment. We need to understand what we consume; not the cost
of consumption but the quantities of goods and services, of energy and
information, of both tangible and intangible variables. We need to
understand where resources come from and what risk are involved in dependencies
on distant sources. We need to understand the community ecosystem:
the social and economic processes, the players and partners, and the network of
collaboration and exchange that define the community. We need to access
the resources we have at our disposal and how to combine them into a viable
economic program.
Action plans are not policy
statements; they are business plans. They are about what will be
achieved, who will do the job, and how the job will be accomplished. Each
module of the master plan is expected to not only pay for itself but also
provide significant economic benefit to the community. This model
requires extraordinary innovation.
Achieving a sustainable future
requires a dedicated leadership. It requires organization and
resources. It requires investments.
Implementation involves organization,
markets, financial planning, systematic and effective networking and
communication, entrepreneurship, training and education, community development,
and other things outlined in the template.
Community ownership of the process is
absolutely essential. Governments and institutions are partners rather
than authorities. The model is bottom up, not top down. The leaders
of a community enterprise are those who take the responsibility for getting
things done in a collaborative and cooperative, open-source, manner.
Vision 10 – 10
Economic progress can only be
achieved by setting achievable goals. Vision 10 – 10 sets objectives of
ten percent economic redevelopment in ten years in each of a dozen
sectors. The first ten percent will be the hardest and parts of that
extremely challenging in themselves.
Once attained, however, rapidly development is readily achievable.
Ten percent residential renewable
electricity, for example, translates into a count of households in the
designated zone multiplied by the best estimates of the cost of installation of
wind, solar and other means of generating that electricity.
Even on a small scale, say 5,000
households, the cost estimate can give you sticker shock. Nonetheless, it
represents an achievable objective. As an economic problem, it is not a
matter of trying to figure out how to get the government to fund this program
but how to make it a leverage to both pay for itself and to create significant
economic advantage for the community.
Once the objective is set it is
obviously necessary to mobilize champions and organize the program. It
will be immediately obvious that there is a long list of daunting barriers to
getting this job done. There must, therefore, be strong motivation and
that motivation comes in terms of both community pride and the promise of
prosperity.
Essential to this model is that while
there are a dozen or more major initiatives, they must be closely
coordinated. The Master Plan Template and the Community Ecosystem Mapping
tool help achieve this objective.
Community ownership means
transparency. This involves not only providing daily updates on the
projects but inviting active public participation in meetings, events and
celebrations.
Leadership
Creating a sustainable future requires a new type of
leadership. The challenges of our day
are different than those that preceded it.
Each period in our social and economic development has required its own
form of leadership. As Einstein said, we
cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that created them. A new leadership must build on the capacity
to manage complexity, so see the whole picture, perceive patterns, and the
knowledge and skills necessary to affect significant and lasting change.
We call this new style of stewardship, Deep Leadership.
Copyright
© 2017, Bill Sharp, Transition Centre
No comments:
Post a Comment